Thursday, July 5, 2012

Everything You Like About Netflix? Analysts Think That's a Bad Idea

It doesn't surprise me to see more evidence that, in today's connected world, the interests of consumers and entertainment providers continue to diverge greatly. It's just rare to see it expressed so blatantly. Techdirt wrote up a recent analyst's report on kids' programming on Netflix in which the conclusions were reached that

  1. parents and kids like being able to watch what they want when they want
  2. especially since there are no commercials
  3. and this is a bad thing for kids' programming providers like Viacom and Disney
  4. so they should try to restrict this viewing in favor of their own channels

Disney on Netflix

The first two points are not at all surprising to anyone who's tried any kind of DVR or Netflix programming. The last two may not be news, either ' many observers have seen that providers hate viewers having more choice and control over what they consume, especially when it comes at lower flat rates instead of paying per movie or TV show. I'm not sure exactly how they're supposed to restrict that behavior, though, since today's digital world is all about providing more control to consumers, less to the traditional media giants.

What's not realized in the advocation of this strategy for the giants is that some viewers are more loyal to the method than the content. That is, they're more likely to stick with Netflix, watching what is available there, than follow Disney back to their walled gardens.

Similar Posts: Rental Calendars Have Different Release Dates § Don't Like UltraViolet Digital Movies? You Can't Sell the Codes § Warner Thinks Waiting to Netflix DVDs Will Help Sales § Shock! Price Matters ' At Least in Music § Viz Anime Streaming on Netflix Adds Death Note

One Response  
Gedece writes:  

You are absolutely right. I have Netflix from Netflix Argentina, which offers some content that's slightly different from other countries, and a lot that is common to all.

After some adjustments where Netflix found out most people in Argentina prefers to have the option of original audio and subtitles even for kids stuff, I subscribed.

I love being able to follow a series at my own pace, I'm currently watching lots of things I hadn't because normal tv time sometimes collides with other things I do.

I know there are several things missing, but the stuff that's already there is enough to keep me interested for years. So, after some thinking I arrived to the same conclusion you did.

It's the format and freedom that I love,and I don't watch other series on TV though I like them because my time is my own, and I don't live according to tv timetables.

 
Leave a Comment


Wonder Woman/Archie Fashion Mashup

Image of Wonder Woman/Archie Fashion Mashup
Similar Posts: More on the DeCarlo Family: Dan's Sons and Their Pinups § Archie: The Best of Dan DeCarlo Volume 1 § Gisele's Josie Tryout § Josie and the Pussycats DVD PR Wrong About DeCarlo § Archie: The Best of Dan DeCarlo Volume 2

Comment now »



USA Today's Aurora Rose = Buffy as Babysitter

USA Today has begun serializing a weekly online comic called Aurora Rose.

The first issue is 17 pages, of which three are alternate covers, including a photo variant. I'm not sure why a digital comic needs those. But the models and their agency gets credit! Story is by Jason Stevens and William Wilson with art by Taylor Bills. Although Wilson says they don't want to 'make books about women who look like strippers', this is one of the covers:

Aurora Rose

The tale, such as it is, reminds me of Buffy as a babysitter, with a hot young thing fighting demons to protect the innocent. The creators are obviously aware of the similarities, saying:

Many of today's strong female leads owe a lot to the title heroine of Joss Whedon's Buffy the Vampire Slayer, and Stevens admits that Aurora has some Buffy DNA in her. But there are also elements of Adventures in Babysitting, John Carpenter's original Halloween, and even some old-school Lynda Carter Wonder Woman in the series, too, all with a 1980s Spielbergian bent.

The narrative voice is snarky, as though nothing mattered, very wannabe Whedon. Only the interview at the web page tells us all this, because none of it's visible in the comic yet. Typical of first issues these days, it's badly paced, with no scenes with the title heroine. It's all background and setup, telling us of various mysterious conspiracy groups and their long history. The problem is, we have no reason to care because we have no connection to any of it. Plus, it's too familiar in terms of having seen it all before. I don't really need another monster-fighting story where a bunch of old men sitting around a table tell the few female characters what to do.

If you do want to read more, new pages will be posted every Tuesday.

Similar Posts: Buffy the Vampire Slayer: The Long Way Home § Aurora Pulls Online Manga From Netcomics § Buffy the Vampire Slayer: Tales of the Slayers § Fractured Franchise: Dark Horse Reclaims Angel to Go With Buffy § Darn, Motion Comics Aren't Dead Yet: Buffy Season 8, Black Panther Yanked

Comment now »



Wednesday, July 4, 2012

Spinner Rack: X-Men Legacy 269, Archie 634, Angel & Faith 11, Resident Alien 2

X-Men Legacy #269

X-Men Legacy #269 cover

Writer: Christos Gage
Penciler: David Baldeon
Inker: Jordi Tarragona
Marvel, $2.99

Rogue and Ms. Marvel face off as part of the Avengers vs. X-Men crossover, a particularly fraught battle due to their history. (I assume she's still Ms. Marvel for now. I couldn't find her name in the issue.) Ms. Marvel wants to talk about the danger the Phoenix Five represent, while Rogue has taken their side in the 'war' against the Avengers.

It's a good conflict, one that helps personalize the big event, with lots of intriguing concepts. For example, is it fair to stop someone based on what could happen? Ms. Marvel's fears are more hypothetical than actual at this point, although we all know that power corrupts, especially in superhero comics.

What really struck me about this issue, though, is that Gage manages to sum up the difference between the two mega-teams in simple phrases. As Rogue says,

Guess that's the difference between us and the Avengers. The world already looked pretty good to them. They fought to keep it as it was. We fought to make it better.

And that's what drives most political debates, right? Whether you feel as though you're part of the establishment, or left out of it.

I also like Baldeon's chunky figures, who have good action poses that convey energy while still seeming achievable. It's refreshing to see a super-comic featuring women where the emphasis is on their power, not butt shots. In this issue, they're fighting, struggling to come out on top, without posing for the viewer.

Resident Alien #2

Resident Alien #2 cover

Writer: Peter Hogan
Artist: Steve Parkhouse
Dark Horse, $3.50

I can't really recommend buying this issue, #2 of 3 (not counting the #0 introduction), because at this point, I think you should just get the eventual collection. I like this tale of an extraterrestrial masquerading as town doctor, shanghaied into investigating a murder mystery.

This issue fills in much of the history, of the victims, of the visitor (and how he arrived), and of the nurse, the only person who suspects the doctor isn't what he seems. Her family ' she seeks guidance from her dad ' ties the story back to the Southwestern location as well as explaining, a bit, her unique status. He also provides good advice, restraining the American need to do SOMEthing about weirdness, instead counseling acceptance and patience.

The characters and setting are well-delineated, a pleasure to view, with distinctive coloring and personalities, expressed both through voice and visually. There is a bit of fortuitous circumstance, as a patient I don't recall seeing before gives the doctor the clue he needs to start tying the killings together, but I like the plain-spoken man's take on how to be healthy: 'I eat well, I sleep well, I walk a lot, and I don't take crap from anyone.'

Angel & Faith #11

Angel & Faith #11 cover

Writer: Christos Gage
Art: Rebekah Isaacs
Dark Horse, $2.99

This series keeps surprising me. This issue is part one of a new 'Family Reunion' storyline, which means we see several well-known characters reappear to cause trouble. There are three big names here, which I won't spoil, one of whom is my favorite, one of whom is always a pleasure to see (although I thought he was dead), and one of whom I can't stand.

I'm not sure how I feel about the structure of this series. The TV show, back when, revolved around 'there's a monster, we must stop it.' This story is more proactive, with Angel trying to do something stupid. It allows for more different types of tales, as there's an excuse for Faith and Angel to go do something instead of waiting for trouble to come to them, but invariably, we still get the 'zompire' battle scenes. It's a difficult line to walk, too, with readers wanting to know what's going on with their favorite characters, but at least in my case, I need a series that still works if you remember very little about the details and didn't read all of Buffy Season 8 or the previous Angel comic series.

So far, this is balancing well. Devoted franchise followers may find some of the discussion here exposition-heavy, as one of the guest stars has her own quest that intersects with Angel's desires tangentially. I found it helpful to remind us where we'd left things, and it's leavened with plenty of humor. (I'm quickly becoming a Gage fangirl.) There's an underlying theme running through the series, too, which is how the lack of any magic in the world is making it a worse place to be. (Except that there are still plenty of residual artifacts and demons and such ' it's not a consistency that bothers me, though, because with absolutely no magic, we'd have about 20% of our cast members.)

This issue is very talky, as much of the premise is set up, and given what they set out to do and where they're going, I expect it will be balanced out in the rest of the storyline with more action and wild visuals. Isaacs' characters are nicely done, with enough resemblance to the actors we know, but with the kind of expression lacking in more heavily photo-referenced works. There are lots of feelings on display, as folks reunite and get sad and yell at each other. Very nice hair, too.

Archie #634

Archie #634 cover

Writer: Dan Parent
Penciler: Dan Parent
Inker: Rich Koslowski
Archie, $2.99

The 'Archie Marries Valerie' storyline concludes by satirizing the company's tendency to run these kinds of events. The writer appears to have gotten tired of pairing off Archie and Valerie as a musical family, giving them a prodigal daughter named Star, so eight pages in, Valerie goes walking back down Memory Lane. That's the magical lamppost that shows characters their potential futures.

Since she (and the reader) are bored of the story they've been reading, we start getting glimpses of Archie alternately marrying every other female character in Riverdale ' Cheryl Blossom, Sabrina, Josie, Ginger, even Midge and Ethel. None are happy, based on what we see, leading Valerie to disavow planning for the future in terms of relationships. That makes sense for the characters, perpetually stuck as teens, but it's not so great a message for the readers. It's also a ridiculously over-the-top 'resolution' to this event storyline, running the concept into the ground.

The book ends with (the sadly non-paired) Dilton telling us no one can know the future, so we should 'seize the day'. Which leaves Archie and Valerie smooching, a state of affairs I suspect won't be followed up on until the publisher needs another 'ratings boost'. Or maybe they want to see which possible marriage for Archie catches the attention of readers.



Monday, July 2, 2012

Can Anyone Actually Fight Like That? A Small Piece of Avengers Academy #31

I reached the final page of Avengers Academy #31, a title I like reading, and saw the team gearing for battle against the Phoenix Force-led X-Men. That page looks like this. (Click for bigger.)

Avengers Academy #31 page 22

It's a fairly typical 'we're going to fight you!' superhero team pose, drawn by Timothy Green II, inked by Jeff Huet. However, the way the White Tiger was standing struck me as remarkably silly. Look, here's a closeup:

Avengers Academy #31 White Tiger closeup

First, it doesn't appear that she's actually putting any weight on her feet, especially that one extending off the page. Weirder, though, is how she's pulled her arms back. No one prepares for a punch by forcing their elbow behind their back. That pushes your fist out to the side, not drawn back to hit. The other arm's just kind of hanging there in space, as though she's showing you she has a bicep. This is a 'I've got boobies!' pose, not an 'I'm going to kick your ass' stance.

It shouldn't surprise me that this was considered a reasonable drawing, given the usual state of superhero comic art, even that used in books with a really good balanced and diverse cast of characters. I think I was struck by the pose because it was the last thing I saw in the book as my eyes tracked down the final page of the story.

Similar Posts: Marvel Spinner Rack: Lockjaw & Pet Avengers #1, Iron Man #13, Wolverine vs. Hulk #5, New Mutants #1 § Kick-Ass Debuts to Weak Ticket Sales § Emphasis on Cleavage 'Befuddling' § Marvel Spinner Rack: The New Avengers #16, X-Factor #224.1 § Marvel Spinner Rack: Avenging Spider-Man 1, FF 12, Generation Hope 13

Comment now »



Tokyopop Signals Willingness to Discuss OEL Rights Return, But Contradictory Offer Lacks Details

Per the official Tokyopop Manga Twitter account, the question was asked at last weekend's Anime Expo convention whether Tokyopop would consider returning rights to the creators for the OEL manga (original graphic novels) they are holding onto. The two-part answer was

' the creators need to come to him to get the rights back. He can't track them all down. And since they all have contracts, there will need to be some negotiations. But it's not like Stu won't give rights back at all.

Stu is Stu Levy, owner of the company. Followup Tweets didn't sound quite so optimistic:

But this is business. If one party owns partial rights of a property and the other party wants all the rights' That party would buy the others out. Works like that in every other business, no? I know that sounds so insensitive, but we did pay the creators for these works. It's not as though we got them for free. ^_^;;;;

The smiley face there really makes the message, don't you think? Without knowing what conditions Stu wants to impose upon this deal, it's hard to determine how serious this 'offer' actually is. If, for example, Stu wanted full repayment for all money spent by Tokyopop, including page rate for original creation, I would imagine those negotiations wouldn't go very far. Without more specifics, this appears to be a way to attempt to paper over the poor reputation Levy has with fans without actually taking any action.

More significantly, an actual OEL creator indicated that this was either a recent change or a misrepresentation, tweeting

Huh, about 6 months ago, Stu was a blanket 'no' when we asked to buy back rights. This has def changed?

At that point, the Twitter account backed off the claim:

I was under the impression it had yesterday, but obviously you need to speak to him directly.

This might be another sudden Levy change of mind that messes up the business, much like his abrupt decision to stop publishing last year. Let's hope he actually meant this one, instead of just saying what he thought the questioner wanted to hear.

By the way, a number of fans were disappointed that the much-plugged Tokyopop panel at the show didn't allow any time for questions and answers, instead spending time recapping a history of the company and Stu Levy's accomplishments. Another mismatch between fan and publisher wants appears to be the company's desire to continue with film and TV projects, such as the disappointing America's Greatest Otaku. Fans just want the series they were following completed in print.

Update: I just discovered Stu himself weighed in on his Twitter account:

I have an open door. Any creator can come discuss w me whenever. Some have; many haven't. I am an always have been a fair partner. Each OEL contract is individual and if there is a fair proposition we work it out. but please understood there are multiple partners involved and any agreement has to consider the interests of each partner.

The multiple uses of the word 'fair' are discouraging, since that's such a nebulous concept in business and can't be quantified. I'm guessing we're not going to see any actual OEL right status changes as a result of this.

Similar Posts: Tokyopop Threatens to Rise From the Dead ' Again § Tokyopop Layoffs ' Who's Left? § Tokyopop Planning the Return of Hetalia #3? § More Tokyopop Contract Discussion § Tokyopop Website Replaced By '



Sunday, July 1, 2012

Seeking a Friend for the End of the World

Saw this apocalyptic comedy romance this afternoon, and we enjoyed it, although I wanted to argue with it at times.

Seeking a Friend for the End of the World poster

Steve Carell does an excellent job playing much the same character he portrayed in Crazy, Stupid, Love (but he does it so well), while Keira Knightley (Bend It Like Beckham, those pirate movies) is his wacky, confused, yet adorable neighbor. What sets this apart from any other getting-to-know-each-other odd-couple film is the premise ' the world will end in 21 days when a meteor crashes into it.

The two go on a road trip together, after various misadventures. That was my favorite part, seeing the methods people use to cope ' or not ' with the certain knowledge that the world was going to end. The supporting players are particularly good here, with Connie Britton (Friday Night Lights), Melanie Lynskey (Rose in Two and a Half Men), Rob Corddry, Patton Oswalt, T.J. Miller (She's Out of My League), and Gillian Jacobs (Community) as various folks driven mad in different ways by the coming destruction. You can see some of it in the trailer here, but I actually advise not watching it because the more surprises there are, the more interesting the movie is.

My favorite was Mark Moses (Duck on Mad Men) as the newscaster who's staying on the job to the end. As the news gets worse and hope fades, he becomes more Cronkite-like in his determination to do his best until the end.

Mark Moses in Seeking a Friend for the End of the World

Mark Moses in Seeking a Friend for the End of the World

I was surprised at how much Seeking a Friend for the End of the World reminded me of a classic screwball comedy, much in the vein of It Happened One Night. They both even involve trying to get a somewhat lost and wrongly romantically matched young woman back to her family. The only difference is that, where those other movies had an undercurrent of the world being bad (due to the Depression), only we could improve it if we all pulled together, this one shows the world in worse shape, and how much people crave connection yet no longer know how to achieve it. The older films had much more comedy and optimism; this one is a sadder movie underneath, deep down.

Oh, and there's a bit of High Fidelity in there, too, with the importance given to records and the way the right music captures our feelings.

I was a little blase above about Carell's portrayal being the same kind of role he's played before ' an insurance agent who's moving through life without much feeling or emotion, going through the motions ' but he's very good at it, showing much depth through just the right expression or look in his eyes. It's a position many adults can relate to, where you've made what seem to be the correct choices but you wind up in a place where you no longer know what you want any more, until an extreme event pulls you back into yourself.

SPOILERS follow, so if you don't want to know, stop now.

Seeking a Friend for the End of the World still

That's where I found myself wanting to argue with the film. It's not that I disagreed with it, but that I would have liked to have talked further about the ending, where these two people find each other, even if only for a short time. I think we're supposed to believe that they're really in love and good for each other, but I wasn't quite convinced. It seemed to me that there was a component of 'if you can't be with the one you love, love the one you're with' to the conclusion, and I didn't think that they would work particularly well together if the world wasn't ending.

There are nods made to them accepting some of the pain points in their lives, mostly involving parents, and better understanding how they came to be who they are, but some of that material reads as a bit superficial. Writer/director Lorene Scafaria previously wrote Nick and Norah's Infinite Playlist, another film with indie sensibilities and a belief in sudden true love, and it worked better for me there because the leads were so much younger.

Still, it's nice to think of people having someone to die with when the world is ending, if that's what they want.

Similar Posts: Friends With Benefits § Variable Movie Pricing § Love and Capes: Do You Want to Know a Secret? ' Best of 2008 § Girls Get the Short End of the Stick Again: Disney Renames Rapunzel to Tangled § This Week on TCM: Wonderful Holiday Gifts

Leave a Comment